Is 1 Cor. 15:3-4 all there is to the Gospel?

In the opening verses of 1 Cor. 15 Paul lays out “the gospel.” Yet in Galatians when he warns the Galatian believers not to follow “another gospel,” he never once defends the historicity of the death, burial, and resurrection, but instead defends the doctrine of justification by faith alone. Why the difference in emphasis if he is talking about the gospel in both places?

When Paul declares the gospel in 1 Cor. 15:3-4 (the whole sentence is from v. 3 to v. 8), he is not saying that these three things: the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, are all there is to the Gospel (though it is certainly not less than those three things). There have been false teachers throughout Christian history who have affirmed Jesus’ literal death, burial, and bodily resurrection.

Why then mention those three? Context gives us a clue. He is going to address their doubts about the truth (and thus the importance) of the believer’s resurrection and so he goes back to the nistorical elements that are foundational to the gospel.

The gospel cannot be separated from these historical events. The rest of the gospel is built upon these historical facts, explaining the meaning and significance of the events.


About Michael R. Jones

Pastor and PhD candidate writing on Paul's theology of suffering.
This entry was posted in Gospel, NT. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s